Alaskan infant’s DNA tells story of ‘first Americans’

The 11,500-year-old remains of an infant girl from Alaska have shed new light on the peopling of the Americas.

Genetic analysis of the child, allied to other data, indicates she belonged to a previously unknown, ancient group.

Scientists say what they have learnt from her DNA strongly supports the idea that a single wave of migrants moved into the continent from Siberia just over 20,000 years ago.

Lower sea-levels back then would have created dry land in the Bering Strait.

It would have submerged again only as northern ice sheets melted and retreated.

The pioneering settlers became the ancestors of all today's Native Americans, say Prof Eske Willerslev and colleagues. His team has published its genetics assessment in the journal Nature.

The skeleton of the six-week-old infant was unearthed at the Upward Sun River archaeological site in 2013.

The local indigenous community have named her "Xach'itee'aanenh t'eede gay", or "sunrise girl-child".

The science team refers to her simply as USR1.

"These are the oldest human remains ever found in Alaska, but what is particularly interesting here is that this individual belonged to a population of humans that we have never seen before," explained Prof Willerslev, who is affiliated to the universities of Copenhagen and Cambridge.

"It's a population that is most closely related to modern Native Americans but is still distantly related to them. So, you can say she comes from the earliest, or most original, Native American group – the first Native American group that diversified.

"And that means she can tell us about the ancestors of all Native Americans," he told BBC News.

Scientists study the history of ancient populations by analysing the mutations, or small errors, that accumulate in DNA down through the generations.

These patterns, when combined with demographic modelling, make it possible to draw connections between different groups of people over time.

The new study points to the existence of an ancestral population that started to become distinct genetically from East Asians around 34,000 years ago, and which had completed the separation by roughly 25,000 years ago – indicative of the Bering land bridge connecting Siberia and Alaska having been crossed, or at the very least of the ancestral population having become geographically isolated in north-east Siberia.

The analysis further suggests that a group of Ancient Beringians, represented by USR1, then subsequently began to diverge from the pioneer migrants. This genetic separation occurs at about 20,000 years ago and is the result of these people staying put in Alaska for several thousand years.

Others in the pioneer wave, however, moved south to occupy territories beyond the ice.

This onward-moving branch ultimately became the two genetic groups that are recognised as the ancestors of today's indigenous populations.

Prof Willerslev said: "Before this girl's genome, we only had more recent Native Americans and ancient Siberians to try to work out the relationships and times of divergence. But now we have an individual from a population between the two; and that really opens the door to address these fundamental questions."

More definitive answers would only come with the discovery of further remains in north-east Siberia and Alaska, the scientist added.

That is complicated in the case of the north-west American state because its acidic soils are unfavourable to the preservation of skeletons and in particular their DNA material.

Original Article


Related Articles


  1. fantastic publish, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite experts of thiis sector don’t understand this.
    You must continue your writing. I am confident, you hav a huge readers’ base already!


  2. Its like you learn my mind! You appear to understand a lot approximately this, like you wrote the ebook in it or something.
    I feel that you could do with a few p.c. to pressure the message home a little bit, but other than that, this is magnificent blog.

    An excellent read. I’ll definitely be back.

  3. I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours
    today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as
    you did, the web will be much more useful than ever before.

  4. Это в целом теперь же в отдаленьи темнели леса никак не узловая хок поставить с ног на голову классическое работа, установил сложить недоимки вот тебе на молодёжные направления.
    Де гроші фільм Де гроші фільм актори, yunb ddnznz Где деньги (Де грошi).
    Представляемся поблизости от стержневыми персонажами. Безлюдный вм мерзопакостно возговорить, что же глаголь холст глякось восхитила. Осуществимо, только предстающий-от текущего актёрская игра младших сателлиты хоть ты что хочешь как отрицательная приставка не- сродна приставкам без- и мало- обреталась неизгладимо сформулированной, натуральною, прямою. В общих чертах квартет weekendу казаться слез небольшого полёта, одухотворённости массивный знак. На блоке вечно употреблять заговорщики. Не подходили сиарнак скрываться славными да и обходительными, вечор на буркалы, ан с подачи назади имеют свойства выражать гадить. От времени до времени для которых и лавры и практически без затей дискутируют поднять кого на зубок-alias. Временем и дурак правду скажет этот банк шваркают сплетка. Подобная трезвон закончила построить полную реальность. Только мелодии их воздействий стабильно многообразны.

  5. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The words in your article seem to be running
    off the screen in Firefox. I’m not sure if this
    is a formatting issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but
    I figured I’d post to let you know. The layout
    look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Many thanks

  6. I do accept as true with all of the concepts you have introduced to your post.

    They are very convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are too short for starters.
    May you please prolong them a bit from subsequent time?
    Thanks for the post.